When the psychologist helps you win a lawsuit

The forensic psychologist is a collaborator of justice. When clarifying a case, the relevant bodies will need extraordinary information from a public expert to shed light on the resolution to be taken.

For example, in cases where there has been abuse of any kind against a person, the psychologist will provide a report describing the extent of the damage suffered by the victim.

This will help the judge to impose compensation based on the damage the defendant caused. Another very common case is when it is necessary to assess the danger of an individual for reasons of mental health. The psychologist will write a detailed report in which the opinion on the patient’s degree of illness will be revealed. Generally, the expert will be invited to the hearing to be solicited in case more details are needed or the prosecutor and the other party so require.

    In which cases is psychological expertise required?

    Two are generally the most frequent cases in which a forensic expertise is the most required ex officio.

    First, psychosocial study in conflicting divorces, in which custody and custody of children must be granted or withdrawn from someone. An expert will set up a meeting with the two parties and the children to do a series of interviews.

    On the other hand, when it comes to assessing the incapacity of a person, the forensic psychologist will fulfill the function of translating to the judge the effects of the pathology from which the user suffers so that he has probative information. in the dispute.

    If you are going through a divorce and have an appointment with a forensic expert, here is what you can expect from the test. First of all, you need to be clear that the psychosocial study is not meant to judge either party. It won’t assess your sanity either, by far. Of course, don’t expect him to be as understanding as a psychologist in therapy.

    The function of psychological expertise is to obtain as much information as possible from both parents to dictate clear conclusions about the abilities of both parties as parents. On the basis of the information provided by the expert, the judge will order shared custody or will only grant it to one of the parents. In extreme cases, where the well-being of the child is threatened, the judge will look for a foster family.

    Our biggest advice is to be honest with the expert. It is very likely that the court file will open in your possession, so any form of misrepresentation or deceit on your part can only harm you.

    Our second best tip is to go quietly and be a collaborator at all times. The expert is only a professional. He has nothing against you.

    Finally, check with your lawyer to see if there is anything informative you can bring to the interview and the judge is unlikely to accept it as evidence. For example, children’s drawings, recordings or photos.

    What will the psychosocial study consist of?

    The psychologist will interview the parties separately and together. The interview could include other family members, such as the grandparents of the minors.

    Note that the expert is neither on your side nor on the other side. The expert defends the interests of minors. They will perform psychometric tests that will help them understand what will benefit them the most. Parents will not be present at the interview with the children.

    After that, he will write a report which will be sent to the judge and the two litigants will receive a copy.

      In case of disability, is it essential to call a psychologist?

      As we indicated at the beginning, the judge will decide whether or not he needs additional information to pass a sentence. When the magistrate deems it appropriate not to need an expert, providing one yourself will not be of much help. In addition, you will spend money to have the report rejected as visible evidence. You will end up throwing in the trash a report that you paid for out of pocket.

      Why is this happening? Well, the judge knows ahead of time that he’s a childbirth specialist, not a public forensic pathologist. In other words, the magistrate will consider that because he is a private doctor, his report could be biased or contain flaws. Default evaluations do not use default forensic trials because, as we said, trials are simpler than trials in custody. However, you can help in very complex cases in which the file does not reflect the complexity of the pathologies from which the user suffers. Here the psychologist can provide more specific details about the seriousness of the case.

      Before hiring anything, quickly consult a psychologist you trust to see if the file contains any errors. because it does not reflect the reality of users’ pathologies.

      On the other hand, if you are a lawyer, you should know that not all judges accept this evidence, even though the public report may be incomplete. Not all judges attach the same importance to psychological expertise. This is also essential before spending your money.


      To summarize, the usefulness of hiring a psychological expert will depend on a multitude of circumstances. Before using such a private service, ask yourself the following questions: Is the public report sufficiently clear? Are there any nuances that are not recorded and can be decisive for the resolution? Will the judge accept my allegations?

      Once this situation has been reached, the essential will not only be the report that the psychologist can issue, but also the fact that he comes into view and explains them firsthand. This is all the more interesting as both the judge and the prosecution will be able to ask them questions.

      In conclusion: a good psychological expertise, engaged at the right time and in relevant causes, can get your chestnuts out of the fire in a thorny ordeal.

      Leave a Comment