The 4 differences between sustainable and sustainable

We live in a world that has a wide variety of resources, yet humans are increasingly exploiting them and often regardless of whether this exploitation may end up causing damage to nature or whether these resources may be depleted.

Fortunately, over time there is a growing awareness that the resources present in nature are limitedIn addition to this, we must look for ways to provide ourselves that do not waste our world and that can be sustained over time. This has sparked concern for finding sustainable and sustainable pathways, economies, resources or infrastructure. These two concepts, very common and widely used today, are often used as synonyms and actually have a lot in common.

However, the meaning of each of them has certain nuances that make them not fully refer to the same reality. This is why faced with a better use of the two words, throughout this article let’s discuss the main differences between sustainable and sustainable, With concepts to know how to differentiate them.

    Sustainable vs Sustainable: defining the two concepts

    In order to analyze the differences between durable and sustainable, it is advisable to make a brief definition of each of the terms, in order to see their similarities and perhaps visualize some differentiating nuances.

    It is understood to be durable in quality which indicates the ability to maintain and break down for an extended period of time, Without causing environmental damage or depleting environmental resources. As a rule, it is used in concepts such as development, exploitation and use of resources, requiring for sustainability a balance between the economy, the social and the environment. Likewise, the concept implies the non-use of resources at speeds greater than those required by nature for its creation.

    The term enduring refers to the quality of being able to support or defend oneself, generally referring to ideas and arguments, on one’s own. It usually involves a defense by some already logical reason and tends to refer to ideas and arguments although it is also used to talk about a regulated development that allows the satisfaction of current needs without endangering those of the future. It implies self-sufficiency, as it only requires oneself and the various elements that are part of its own enduring element to remain unchanged.

      Main differences between sustainable and sustainable

      Durable and durable are, as we have seen, very similar concepts, the differences are minimal. In fact, there are big differences as to whether they can be used interchangeably or differ from each other, And are often considered to be full synonyms. But other than that, it is possible to find a number of shades (but not too strong) in which they differ. Among them we can consider the following.

      1. What do you mean?

      Although they are generally used as complete synonyms and technically at the lexical level, this would not be wrong, some differences can be observed with regard to the areas in which each concept is applied.

      Generally, the term sustainable is used to refer to processes such as developing or maintaining an economy, fundraising, social functioning or an activity, while sustainable is often used in relation to ideas, arguments, approaches, points of view or concepts (eg a trial or debate).

      However, it should be borne in mind that in this regard there are regional differences. In Spain in general, the term related to development is generally sustainable, while in Latin America there is a tendency to use sustainable more often in this area.

      2. Exogenous vs endogenous

      A second difference between sustainable and sustainable refers to the fact that the idea of ​​sustainability it implies the existence of something external which is capable of sustaining and sustaining the unaltered state of the durable. It could be the implementation of policies or the human activity itself to preserve the current state of affairs, for example. The idea of ​​sustainability would therefore imply a certain exogeneity, since the sustained requires an effort or the involvement of external elements.

      On the other hand, when we talk about something lasting, we are talking about something that, if it needs something to keep it (sustainable comes from life, in Spanish), that element is internal or endogenous. .

      In other words, in this case there would be no need for anything outside to intervene to achieve a current state hold: An idea or an argument is durable because it is able to justify itself, just as an environment can be if it does not need anything that is not part of itself to remain unchanged.

      3. Structure vs maintenance

      One of the differences between sustainable and sustainable is that as a general rule the concept of sustainability only indicates that at the structural level what it refers to can be maintained, while that of sustainable also includes the idea that this quality requires something to maintain it (Although internal).

      4. Temporal approach

      Another small nuance that is usually not taken into account is the length of time involved in each concept. Although in both cases we are talking about something with the ability to stay in time, in general durable usually indicates a present state or capacity for immutabilityWhile the idea of ​​sustainability has a more state-driven undertone that will have what it refers to in the future.

      Bibliographical references:

      • Baeyens, G .; Martinez, ML (2007). Coastal dunes: ecology and conservation. Springer. p. 282.
      • Huesemann, MH and Huesemann, JA (2011). Technofix: Why Technology Won’t Save Us or the Environment, New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, British Columbia ISBN 0-86571-704-4.

      Leave a Comment